Microservices vs Service-Oriented Architecture: Two Key Approaches to Modern Software Design

Table of contents

Service-oriented architecture (SOA) and microservices are two terms that often come up in discussions about software development. For those outside the world of system architecture, it can be tricky to understand what they mean and how they differ.

This article unpacks both concepts and explains how they work and what sets them apart. By the end, you’ll clearly understand their roles in designing modular, efficient, and scalable solutions.

What Is Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA)?

Service-oriented architecture is all about connecting the dots. It’s a design approach that breaks down complex systems into independent services, each focusing on a specific business function. What’s excellent about SOA is that these services can work together, even if they’re built with different tools or technologies, because they use standard communication protocols.

The idea is simple: instead of developing software from scratch, you can reuse services across multiple applications. For example, a company might have a single authentication service that all its apps rely on. One shared patient registration service in healthcare could support multiple systems like electronic health records and appointment management. It’s a smarter, more efficient way to build and integrate.

What makes SOA stand out as an architectural style are its principles:

  • Interoperability: Services can communicate regardless of the underlying technology.
  • Loose coupling: Services operate independently, so changes to one don’t disrupt the rest.
  • Abstraction: Users don’t need to know how a service works; they just use it.
  • Granularity: Each service is focused on one specific task.

At the heart of SOA are three key roles: service providers (who create and manage services), service consumers (who use them), and service registries (directories that help consumers find services). Together, they make it easier to build applications by connecting reusable building blocks.

What Is Microservices Architecture?

Microservices architecture takes a different approach. Instead of connecting systems across an organization, it focuses on breaking a single application into smaller, independent components.

Unlike a traditional monolithic architecture, where everything is bundled into one extensive application, each part focuses on a specific business function and runs its process. These parts are loosely coupled, meaning they operate independently and communicate with others through lightweight protocols like HTTP or WebSockets.

A key concept in microservices is the idea of a bounded context. This means every piece has a clear boundary for what it’s responsible for. It handles only its own functionality, data, and rules without interfering with different services. For example, in an e-commerce platform, one part might manage user accounts while another focuses on processing payments.

Each microservice also owns its domain logic and data. This allows teams to use the best technologies and tools for that particular task. Because they’re independent, microservices can be developed, deployed, and updated without disrupting the rest of the application.

Software architect at work.

Similar but Different: Two Approaches to Building Modular Systems

SOA and microservices share the goal of modularity, but they’re fundamentally different in how they approach it.

Why SOA and Microservices Are Not the Same

While both approaches focus on modularity, their goals and how they work are quite different.

  1. Purpose and focus
    SOA emphasizes reusability, with services often designed to be shared across multiple systems. Microservices, on the other hand, focus on breaking a single application into smaller, independent parts. Each service is designed to handle one task, which makes it easier to develop, deploy, and update.
  2. Service design
    SOA tends to group related business processes into more extensive services that can handle more comprehensive tasks. This approach is useful when services need to be reused in different contexts. Microservices are much smaller and more focused, with each service dedicated to a specific function. This narrower scope makes them highly flexible and easier to manage individually.
  3. Origins and evolution
    Microservices took off with the rise of cloud-native technologies, which make it easier to package, deploy, and scale services independently. While often associated with legacy systems, SOA remains relevant in modern software development. Many organizations still rely on it for large-scale integration, especially when juggling on-premise systems and cloud applications.

Key differences between SOA and Microservices summarized.

SOAMicroservices
ScopeIntegrates multiple applications across an organization.Focuses on breaking a single application into smaller, independent parts.
Service sizeServices are larger and handle broad business functions.Services are smaller and focus on specific tasks or features.
CommunicationOften relies on centralized tools like an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB).Uses lightweight methods like REST or message queues.
Data storageTypically uses shared databases across services.Each service manages its own database independently.
IndependenceServices often depend on shared resources, creating some overlap.Services are fully independent, reducing interdependencies.
DeploymentServices are deployed together as part of a larger system.Each service can be deployed and updated on its own.
ScalabilityScaling usually involves duplicating entire systems.Individual services can be scaled based on demand.
Team structureManaged by centralized teams.Encourages smaller teams, each focusing on specific services.

Microservices vs SOA: Find the Best Fit for Your Business

The right choice depends on your organization’s needs. Think about the scale of your systems, how you want your teams to work, and whether your focus is on integration or agility. Both approaches have their strengths and can help you build systems that are effective today and ready for the future.

When to Use Service-Oriented Architecture

SOA is a good choice for large organizations where multiple technologies and applications must work together, primarily when they are spread across different departments or business units.

It’s beneficial for handling legacy systems that need to be modernized while still functioning alongside newer technologies. For instance, a bank with decades-old account management software might adopt SOA to integrate it with a modern online banking platform.

This approach also works well for managing complex business workflows that involve multiple touchpoints.

Use SOA when:

  • You need enterprise-wide integration: Ideal for connecting systems across departments or business units.
  • Legacy systems are involved: SOA helps modernize older applications and connect them with new ones.
  • Standardization matters: SOA’s centralized governance makes it easier to maintain consistent service management.
  • Reusability is a priority: Services can be shared across applications to reduce duplication and improve efficiency.

When to Use Microservice Architecture

Microservices are better suited for applications that need to adapt and scale quickly. They’re instrumental when you’re building systems that require constant updates or adding new features without disrupting the entire application.

For example, an e-commerce platform might divide its system into smaller services, such as product management, payments, and user accounts, and allow each to evolve independently.

Microservices are also a natural fit for cloud-native applications. Breaking functionality into smaller pieces allows you to focus on scaling only the services that experience increased demand. For example, during a sale, you can scale a checkout service to handle the higher load without allocating unnecessary resources to other parts of the application that aren’t as active.

Use microservices when:

  • You need rapid development and updates: Teams can work on individual features without affecting the whole system.
  • Your application is cloud-based: Microservices allow you to scale specific parts of your system to match demand.
  • Team independence is important: Small teams can take full ownership of their services, reducing dependencies.
  • Resilience is key: Failures in one service don’t bring down the entire application.
  • You need diverse tools or technologies: Different microservices can use the best tools for specific tasks.

Which Should You Choose?

  • SOA is best for organizations that manage legacy applications, integrate multiple systems across an enterprise, or aim to standardize reusable services.
  • Microservices are ideal for modern, cloud-native applications requiring flexibility, quick updates, and independent scaling.

Wrapping Up

Service-oriented architecture and microservices both aim to make software more modular, but they approach this goal differently. SOA connects different systems across an organization, while microservices focus on breaking a single application into smaller, independent parts.

Neither approach is inherently better. It all depends on what you’re trying to achieve. Do you need to integrate large, diverse systems or build flexible, independently scalable components within a single application? Understanding these differences will help you design systems that align with your specific goals and challenges.

Not Sure About the Best Approach to Your Software Design?
Get in Touch with Scalo Consultants!
Ready to Take Your Business to the Next Level?
Contact us to arrange a free workshop with Scalo experts and discover how our innovative solutions can help you solve your challenges and achieve your goals. Fill out this form and book your spot today!
Schedule workshop

This website uses cookies to deliver the service. Find out more or close the message.